Page 1 of 2
Radius compensation
Posted:
Tue Aug 16, 2022 5:14 pmby BKG
###############################################################################
Error: Radius compensation is not supported for UCCNC. Please change the compensation type to 'in computer' for the toolpath.
Error at line: 1443
Error in operation: '2D Contour1'
Failed while processing onLinear() for record 491.
###############################################################################
Does not UCCNC suport Radius compensation ??
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Tue Aug 16, 2022 9:37 pmby Pulcik
Can you provide nc file?
I think, UCCNC support it.
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Tue Aug 16, 2022 10:43 pmby BKG
Same time chekking about sending jpg, I am not able to send with message
Se atached files Nc is txt
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Tue Aug 16, 2022 10:49 pmby ger21
You need an updated Fusion post that supports Comp.
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:12 pmby BKG
ger21 wrote:You need an updated Fusion post that supports Comp.
Newer then this ??
UCCNC post processor configuration.
$Revision: 43862 c7ba73f08fc3a9941aaf4c8abb06710c9a1c83ce $
$Date: 2022-07-06 07:13:32 $
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2022 10:25 amby Pulcik
Nice big machine. Want to build something like that in a future.
Here, is modified PP. It should work now. Test it, if it works as intended, so I can put it to mine one in a future.
Test it on G02 and G03 moves too, and use 1.2113 for it. As the newer versions of UCCNC have bug when you use G02 or G03 with Z coordinates, which I reported in earlier.
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:39 pmby BKG
Pulcik wrote:Nice big machine. Want to build something like that in a future.
Here, is modified PP. It should work now. Test it, if it works as intended, so I can put it to mine one in a future.
Test it on G02 and G03 moves too, and use 1.2113 for it. As the newer versions of UCCNC have bug when you use G02 or G03 with Z coordinates, which I reported in earlier.
Ah thanks
I will test it and came back with the result
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2022 8:47 pmby BKG
Ok, I tryed it shortly, looks like it is compensating the vrong way, it vas going at the outer cirkle
- Toolpath
Ok, I tryed it shortly, looks like it is compensating the vrong way
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2022 10:37 pmby Pulcik
I am not with machine, but g-code seems to be correct compare to the picture from F360.
Re: Radius compensation
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2022 4:26 pmby Pulcik
I tried it on my machine and it seems good. But, the entering is a bit strange.
It seems, that you have some small radius in "lead in" and "lead out" option. That makes the bit enter and compensate on left side (g41) but the radius of feed in/out is smaller than (my 5 mm bit), so it ends up to close at the beginning. after first call of g02, everything is correct, till lead out.
But that is issue your setting in f360. Other than that, it seems to do what you have on picture, in my case.