Re: Macro_capability_detailed.htm - suggested corrections
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:06 am
I know it's more work, but I'd prefer 3 different manuals, or at least 3 different sections.
Very, very few users will ever write plugins, so why make them have to parse through a document where a large percentage of the items don't pertain to them?
Just my thoughts, you don't need to agree. (I'm very grateful for what you've done)
Personally, I'd like a "quick reference", with just a list as you've posted in those previous emails. I'm going to copy those two emails and print them out.
Very, very few users will ever write plugins, so why make them have to parse through a document where a large percentage of the items don't pertain to them?
Just my thoughts, you don't need to agree. (I'm very grateful for what you've done)
Personally, I'd like a "quick reference", with just a list as you've posted in those previous emails. I'm going to copy those two emails and print them out.